@DG
I am not making an interpretive claim and therefore I do not need to provide evidence to support my claim. The Society's prophetic assertions require evidence if we are to believe them. For a specific example, how do we know that Matthew 24 has a secondary, larger fulfillment? That's a particularly important chapter since it contains the 'generation'.
The concept that we take certain prophetic verses and make them have a 19th, 20th, or 21st century secondary application is based on human speculation.
If you do not understand these issues and neither do most of Jehovah's Witnesses, then why do you believe the claim? Do you even know the origin of this interpretive method? Origins are important -- just like the origins of Christmas!
Don't feel bad about not answering. I do know the answers and I have done a little more than just 'study' with Jehovah's Witnesses.